Zionist lobby making macro decisions in American foreign policy
TEHRAN - In a note, Kayhan addressed the hostile approach of America toward Iran and the Zionists’ influence in the continuation of this policy.
It said: More than four-and-half decades have passed since Washington started hostile policy or introduced sanctions against Iran regardless of the fact that a Democrat has been in the White House or a Republican. Whenever there has been a sedition or insecurity in Iran, the Democratic or Republican governments have been in the first line to support the seditionists. The Biden government continued the path of the Trump government in sanctioning Iran. The Zionist lobby is highly influential in shaping American foreign policy. Also, the Zionists' money and resources have always been important in influencing the election of president in the United States. In other words, the American elections are influenced by the Zionists. Therefore, both candidates are in the opposite direction of the interests of the Muslim ummah, including the Iranian nation, and the victory or defeat of each candidate has a decisive role in the macro foreign policies of the United States.
Iran: America and Iran’s security
The Iran newspaper has said more than a year has passed since the start of the Israeli war in Gaza with the full support of the West and America, but the Zionist regime has achieved none of its goals other than killing the Palestinian people. The Zionist regime and the U.S. consider Iran as part of the Axis of Resistance in the region and the main supporter of the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance groups, the main cause of their failure. Considering such an issue, seeking to normalize the violation of our country's territorial integrity will be an option to stop Tehran's successful strategy against Israel. The American government, by backing Israel’s war (on Gaza and Lebanon) and also military threats against Iran is seeking to dissuade Tehran from reacting to the Oct. 26 aggression of the Zionist regime against the Islamic Republic. In fact, it is seeking to normalize Israel's direct attacks on Iran and ultimately affect the security of our country. The Islamic Republic of Iran not only will resolutely respond to the recent aggression of the Zionist regime and the United States’ support for it but will also respond to the anti-security strategy in a measured way.
Hamshahri: Importance of Araghchi's trip to Pakistan
Hamshahri analyzed FM Araghchi's visit to Pakistan and wrote: Islamabad was the destination of the 12th regional visit of Iran's foreign minister. A trip during which Abbas Araghchi consulted with Pakistani officials on a series of regional, international, and bilateral issues. Pakistan is one of the countries in the region that has a strategic partnership with Iran in facing the evils of the Zionist regime in the region. The development of relations between Tehran and Islamabad is of strategic importance for both sides in the current situation in the region. One of the reasons for the importance of this trip is that the two countries have pinned high hopes for cooperation in areas of economy, politics, and security, and accomplishing them is the priority of diplomats from both sides. Also, considering the close positions of Iran and Pakistan regarding the current developments in the region and facing the evils and crimes of the Zionist regime, the continuation of bilateral consultations is of strategic importance.
Jam-e-Jam: A new project for Israel
In an article, Jam-e-Jam dealt with the nudity of a student at the University of Science and Research and the opposition media’s opportunism. It wrote: The encouragement of nudity by the anti-revolution Persian-language media outlets in recent days has created a suspicious atmosphere, which should have its roots in Tel Aviv, especially as the Zionists are in a difficult situation due to the continuous attacks of Islamic fighters. In addition, some news about the complexity and severity of the expected True Promise III Operation has put the Zionists in a state of military-security disarray in their conflict with Tehran and other resistance parties. In such a situation, it is natural for the Persian-language media to try to save their employers in the occupied territories and try to influence the situation under any pretext, because after the martyrdom of some brave men of the army in the Israeli aggression on October 26, the sense of patriotism among the Iranian people was greatly strengthened and the enemy was practically unable to implement the tactic of "creating a gap between the cause of patriotism and the cause of resistance".
Leave a Comment