TEHRAN - In a note, Kayhan addressed the issue of the recent resolution and quoted political analyst Abolfazl Zohrevand as saying: This resolution is completely political and the Westerners are trying to influence Iran's election atmosphere with it.

The fact is that the United States and the European countries that are members of the JCPOA have not fulfilled their obligations. The Islamic Republic of Iran has fulfilled its commitments under the JCPOA, and the countries that withdrew from the JCPOA must fulfill their commitments. It was these collaborations that turned into the JCPOA, and the JCPOA was just a loss for us; We lost our national capacities and stopped, and the Westerners did not take the smallest step toward what they promised, i.e. the lift of sanctions. In any case, these Western actions do not affect Iran's progress in the nuclear field. The Islamic Republic of Iran has chosen its path and despite sanctions and blocked access to global markets, it has done its work well and has shown that sanctions do not affect Iran's progress.

Ham Mihan: The dilemma between Iran and America

In a commentary, Ham Mihan dealt with Iran's challenges in the current situation and wrote: In the current situation, Iran sees itself in a critical dilemma, one that is full of internal and external challenges. The most important of these challenges is the quality of the relationship between Iran and America amid regional tensions over Israel's war with Hamas in Gaza. If the Biden administration, despite its initial desire, fails to reach an agreement with Iran on the JCPOA, the possibility of Trump coming to power in the United States may make the prospects of reaching any agreement much lower. Iran is facing the challenge of how to manage regional influence policies. Internationally, Iran's main challenge is how to manage its relations with the West and balance relations with Russia, China and India amid enduring economic sanctions. Despite all Iran's insistence in its positions, the avoidance of war and efforts for regional peace and stability is the focus of Iran's regional prospects. It should be seen whether these efforts will bring the Biden government and Iran to sit at the negotiating table again or not.

Jam-e-Jam: There are favorable bases for synergy between Iran and Tunisia

In an article, Jam-e-Jam discussed the visit of Tunisian President Kais Saied to Iran to attend the late president's ceremony and quoted Dr. Hadi Ajili, the cultural adviser of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Tunisia, as saying: Kais Saied's visit was the first visit of the head of the Tunisian government to Iran. It is considered a victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran. There are favorable and desirable fields and capacities in the way of synergy and cooperation between Iran and Tunisia, which should be taken advantage of. The geopolitical and cultural role and position of each of the two countries in the region of West Asia and North Africa is clear, and the synergy and cooperation of these two countries will be of special importance and privilege for both of them. Now it's time to integrate the active and passive capacities and bring the relations of these two important international actors into a more operational phase. Considering the wide reception of Tunisian citizens to the artists and cultural groups sent by the Islamic Republic of Iran, it can be said that cultural diplomacy and regional diplomacy are two important channels in realizing the policy of synergy and cooperation between Iran and Tunisia in the international system.

Arman-e-Melli: The Board of Governors made more complicated the issue of negotiations

Arman-e-Melli discussed with Hassan Beheshtipour, an international relations analyst, the possible change in the negotiation process between Iran and the United States after the European troika issued a resolution. It wrote: The text of the resolution is such that it demands more monitoring and not the referral of Iran's case to the Security Council. However, in any case, the important point is that any kind of resolution against Iran is case-building and we should not deal with it lightly, because any resolution issued is against national interests. Iran is cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and in the current situation, issuing a new resolution will not bring any other result except to complicate the situation. An unwritten agreement between Iran and the United States has been reached indirectly, and because the European troika was outside of this agreement, they are pushing for their participation and role-playing. Our main problem is America and we have to solve our problems with the American side, so if we succeed in this direction, the troika of Europe would not have enough maneuvering power in this field to be able to obstruct and take measures against Iran by issuing a resolution.