TEHRAN - In a note, Jam-e-Jam discussed the visit of Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, to Tehran and Iran's nuclear case.

It wrote: Grossi said that the Iranian government must understand that the international conditions are becoming more tense every day and Iran's opportunities for maneuver are decreasing. If we look at Grossi's statements with an optimistic view, it should be said that the way to close the Iran case and prevent the formation of new tension lies in Grossi's hands. The technical approach and the Agency's return to a professional and impartial procedure is the only solution for fetching up the negotiations because the Iranians have behaved with honesty many times, but they have seen no results other than disruption and non-compliance by the Westerners. Grossi should have a technical view of the Iran case if he wants to be known as a fair and professional person. He should pay attention to the fact that Iran not only is not going to cease its legal (nuclear) path or forego its rights, but the resumption of the failed game of maximum pressure by the Americans may lead to a change in Iran's nuclear strategy.

Javan: Mutual dependence of Israel and ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ movement on each other

In an analysis, Javan dealt with Netanyahu's clear support for the Women, Life, Freedom movement and said: In his recent message, Netanyahu fired the final shot and revealed the mutual dependence of the Zionists and the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement. The saboteurs were disappointed with the results of the economic sanctions to change the regime in Iran and are waiting for a military attack on Iran now. But among Iran's hostile governments, they do not hope for anyone but Netanyahu to attack Iran. Therefore, they have supported his crimes. Now that Netanyahu (who is on the verge of facing another missile attack from Iran) and his assassinations and attacks failed to create a kind of deterrence, they are hoping to weaken Iran through internal chaos with the help of saboteurs. Netanyahu knows that neither the Zionist missile attack nor the riots of the fall of 2022 were successful. Netanyahu and the Iranian saboteurs have tied their fate to each other, and revealing their connections should be taken as a good omen because it will lead to the destruction of both together.

Donya-e-Eqtesad: Trump's special envoy in Iravani’s room?!

In an article, Donya-e-Eqtesad addressed the claim of the New York Times about the meeting of the trusted man of President-elect Donald Trump with the Iranian ambassador to the United Nations in New York. The paper said: Elon Musk, a close adviser to President-elect Trump met with Iran's ambassador to the United Nations in New York. Two Iranian officials described the meeting as a discussion on how to reduce tension between Iran and the United States. Musk has emerged as the most powerful private citizen and has been present at nearly all of Trump's job interviews for individuals. The first face-to-face meeting between a senior Iranian official and Musk raises the possibility of a change of tone between Tehran and Washington in the Trump administration, despite its bad record during his previous presidency. Iran had banned any negotiations with the Trump administration, but now after Trump's reelection, Iran is openly debating whether it can now reach a new and more stable deal with the United States.

Ettelaat: Prediction of possible talks between Iran and US 

In an interview with Mehdi Motaharnia, an analyst on international issues, Ettelaat dealt with the possibility of resuming negotiations between Iran and the United States and the opportunities and threats concerning the reelection of Donald Trump. He said: In the discussion about the possibility of talks between the Islamic Republic and the United States, we cannot be indifferent to the moves of the Zionist regime these days.  In such a situation if Trump has a feeling that the Zionist regime is seeking to increase tension in the region and cannot create a deterrence, Israel's moves in the region will become more escalatory. It is predicted that the West wants to increase moves against Iran by supporting the Zionist regime. If Iran refuses to sit at a negotiating table in which the interests of the United States are not observed the West will create a situation in which Iran will face an economic crisis. The Pezeshkian government is trying to reduce tensions and create a basis for the resumption of a new round of negotiations through international consultations. Of course, it is complicated and perhaps impossible to conduct negotiations between Iran and the United States in a way that is favorable to Iran.