TEHRAN - In a note, Jam-e-Jam addressed the joint statement of the three European countries Germany, England, and France.

It wrote: These three countries asked the Islamic Republic of Iran and the resistance groups to give up attacking Israel. Without pointing out the role of the criminal Zionist regime in the escalation of murder in Gaza and the continuation of their evils in the West Asia region, these countries have tried to replace the oppressed and the aggressor by giving the wrong address regarding the developments in West Asia. They also tried to dissuade Iran from responding with the trick of "intimidation", and secondly, to instill in the public opinion that any response from Iran could have such consequences for the country. During the past 10 months, the troika has never tried to achieve a ceasefire and has not worried about the expansion of the war in the region. Therefore, it is obvious that their claims, which are more than a passing role in this scene, cannot be taken seriously. Although the Europeans are doing the task assigned to them by their American-Zionist masters, they should know that Iran's decision to punish this criminal is definite and their deceitful efforts will have no effect in this regard.

Kayhan: The Zionists are panicking

In an analysis, Kayhan dealt with the issue of Iran's revenge against Israel and quoted Sadollah Zarei, an expert on international issues, as saying: There are two elements in the field of Iran's response to the assassination of martyr Haniyeh. One element is revenge and the other element is surprise. The element of revenge indicates the certainty of our actions, and the element of surprise determines the uncertainty of the time, place, and way of our actions. It means that we do not provide any information to the enemy about how to react to this issue. The result of such a policy is that it forces the regime to be on a state of alert in all areas. On the other hand, this situation will be costly for the enemy, that is, it will upset the regime and cause complete panic in its members. Therefore, the Zionists want this incident to happen very quickly and be over so that their situation becomes normal, but this is not compatible with the policy of the Islamic Republic, which wants to carry out the operation surprisingly.

Donya-e-Eqtesad: The prospect of renewing Iran's diplomacy with the United States and the European Union

In a commentary, Donya-e-Eqtesad wrote: In his inauguration speech, Masoud Pezeshkian undertook to normalize Iran's relations with the world, which reflects Tehran's need to reduce sanctions that have affected Iran's economy. The most reasonable path for the European Union, especially the European troika, is to use the emergence of a new government in Iran for diplomatic re-engagement on the nuclear issue. The new agreement can create a space for changes in other Iranian policies. The reformers are probably looking to balance relations with Europe, not to cut ties with Russia, but to diversify the country's foreign relations. One tangible step is for the European Union to help Iran meet the requirements of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the global watchdog for combating money laundering and terrorist financing. During the campaign, Pezeshkian expressed interest in removing Iran from the FATF blacklist, which is important to improving Iran's business relations.

Etemad: The focus should be on bilateral diplomacy
In a conversation with Shoaib Bahman, an expert on Russian affairs, Etemad discussed the 14th government's attempt to balance between the West and the East. The paper said: The foundation of Iran's foreign policy is the pursuit of a balancing policy. As a rule, Iran should be ready for extensive cooperation with all parties and send the message to all parties that Iran, as an independent country, is willing to cooperate and develop its relations both with countries like Russia and China and with Western countries, especially European countries. In the current situation, Iran should not keep its potential and actual capacities suspended and should use all the opportunities that exist in the international system. We need very strong intelligence and diplomacy, and the new government should be demanded to be able to focus on different aspects of diplomacy, communicate with all parties, and ensure their interests. In the current situation, what the government can do is focus on multilateral diplomacy.