TEHRAN - In an interview with Ghasem Molaei, a senior analyst of international issues, Shargh investigated claims about the readiness of the Biden administration to revive the JCPOA with Iran and said: The Kuwaiti Al-Jarida newspaper claimed that the representatives of the American side informed the Iranians last Tuesday that the Biden government is ready to negotiate for a quick return to the nuclear agreement signed in 2015 after making simple reforms to it.

After the withdrawal of Joe Biden from the U.S. presidential election and the entry of Kamala Harris, now the Democrats are trying to make the negotiation with Iran and the temporary agreement with Tehran an achievement for themselves. On the other hand, the Republican movement and Trump will prevent possible future negotiations and any agreement between the Biden government and Tehran. The solution of the Biden administration under the keyword "understanding or unwritten agreement" can evade all the domestic opponents of the United States to negotiate with Iran and revive the JCPOA. In any case, if the foundation for new negotiations to reach another agreement is on the agenda of the new governments of Tehran and Washington, it will still be based on the negotiations and the text of the 2015 JCPOA agreement.

Farhikhetgan: Critics of the regime on the right side of history

In a note, Farhikhtegan dealt with Netanyahu's trip to America. It wrote: Netanyahu likes controversy and power together. In his opinion, creating controversy can help to continue his power. In his speech to Congress, he brazenly described the American people as idiots for protesting against the war and accused them of receiving financial aid from Iran. These positions caused John Kirby to say that we know that Iran has tried to interfere and create divisions in some cases, but saying that they were all financed by Iran is unfortunate and does not reflect the reality of the protests, because most of the protests are spontaneous and show the real concern of the people. What can be noticed is the distancing of the U.S. government from Netanyahu's statements. Kirby has distanced himself from Netanyahu without abandoning his government's position of putting pressure on and accusing Tehran.

Jam-e-Jam: Netanyahu's desperate attempt for Iranophobia

In a commentary, Jam-e-Jam addressed Israel's fear of Iran and wrote: The important issue that happened during the presence of the criminal Zionist prime minister in the U.S. Congress was his desperate attempt to eliminate Iran. In his statements, Netanyahu frequently pointed out the two countries of America and Iran, the first being its biggest supporter and the other its biggest enemy, and demanded the elimination of Iran by America. A large part of Netanyahu's spiteful rhetoric against Iran is rooted in his fear of Islamic Iran. America's actions against Iran have always been doomed to failure. Undoubtedly, the True Promise operation clarified the situation even more for the Zionists and especially for Netanyahu that he is facing a superpower in the region, and to repel Iran's drone attacks, he resorted to Western countries in the region.

Arman-e-Emrooz: Reviving the JCPOA in overtime

On the internet, it has been said that the Biden administration has sent an important message to Pezeshkian for the quick revival of the JCPOA, and the purpose of this action is to increase the chances of Kamala Harris winning against Donald Trump. In response, it can be said that there is no information about the authenticity of this message, but there is a possibility of sending a message that the Biden government is ready to negotiate with the new government of Iran. If, as it has been said, the revival of the JCPOA can be so effective in the American elections that it increases Harris's chances, first Biden himself and then Harris should have announced the promise of the JCPOA revival in their election activities. But it seems that the revival of the JCPOA and the lifting of sanctions in this sensitive regional situation have a negative result for the Biden government, and in this situation where Israel is involved in the most important war in its history, the signing of this agreement can become a domestic controversy in the United States. This issue, before the Republicans, a strong protest will follow from a part of the Democrats. In any case, it is unlikely that the negotiations between the United States and Iran will end in an agreement before the American elections.