TEHRAN - In its editorial, Kayhan pointed out the expansion of Iran's relations with the world and wrote: Except for the Zionist regime, all the American continent except the United States, all the African continent and all the European continent except England are a vast international environment for the Islamic Republic and the field of national interests of Iran.

Nearly 200 countries are the environment of Iran's national interests and two or three countries are the environment of opposition to Iran's national interests. Because of this hostility which is in their political nature, no matter how we join them, they don't give us anything. These few countries are waiting to weaken us so that they can strike. Begging to get rid of their evil will not be useful. We must increase our capabilities in connection with different countries in the four continents of the world to eliminate the thought of weakening Iran. We should not humiliate our nation and underestimate the great ability of our dignified administration to gain the support of the powers that have sworn to destroy us.

Jam-e-Jam: Standing in the field

In a note, Jam-e-Jam discussed the positions of Pezeshkian and the anti-revolution reaction to these positions. The paper said: The president-elect of Iran supported the axis of resistance and said: "We will not bow down to any power." The successive insults of the opposition media and anti-revolutionary accounts have taken more serious positions after this statement, which shows that they are the vassals of the American-Zionist circles. It also shows that Pezeshkian is standing on the right side of history and against the crimes of the fake regime. With these interpretations, it seems that the thought of Pezeshkian in the field of resistance not only does not have any problem with the strategic principles and red lines of the original and humane discourse of the Islamic Revolution but also insists and shouts it. This is what has made the American officials who support Zionism confused about the precise understanding of the Pezeshkian government's behavior in the area of ??the resistance axis. It is obvious that the president-elect of a nation that has been the flag bearer of the "field" of this movement in reaching the peak of conquest and final victory for at least half a century, will not have an approach other than this, despite all the pressures and enmities.

Hamshahri: The anger of saboteurs over the president-elect

Hamshahri dedicated its headline to anti-revolution anger and said: The anti-revolution anger over the failure of the "election boycott" strategy had not yet ended, and the revolutionary positions and recent meetings of the president-elect have once again provoked the anger of the opponents. The president-elect's emphasis on the continuation of Iran's support for the resistance front and the emphasis on the expansion of relations between Iran and Russia, among the positions of the president-elect in recent days, has angered the opponents and has created a new wave of propaganda. Also, the president-elect's emphasis on the implementation of the general policies of the system is one of the other axes that the anti-revolutionaries, by highlighting it in the discourse of Pezeshkian, has tried to bring a wave of destruction and propaganda to the 14th government based on this approach, Pezeshkian considered the general policies of the system declared by the Supreme Leader of the Revolution to be the most important work plan of the future government and the country's development prospects.

Donya-e-Eqtesad: The Middle East will become unstable with the normalization agreement

In a commentary, Donya-e-Eqtesad dealt with strategy of containing Iran by the United States with the normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia. It wrote: Washington believed that this agreement would stabilize the turbulent region and limit Iran, which has become increasingly bold. But Israel's behavior has inflamed the Arab world and threatened its stability. Israel imagines that, if necessary, Washington will control the behavior of Arab countries, and the anger of these countries against Israel is balanced by their fear of Iran. Israeli officials expect that with the continued escalation of tensions with Iran, Arab countries will have no choice but to ally with Israel and the United States and that Abu Dhabi and Riyadh will end their normalization agreements with Tehran. But the Israeli authorities are wrong. Since the normalization of relations with Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have become safer. They have no interest in violating their agreements, especially since their people do not currently see Iran as an enemy. Instead, their enemy is Israel. Until there is a clear path to a Palestinian state, there is little chance that Israel and Saudi Arabia will be able to normalize relations.