TEHRAN - In an analysis, Kayhan discussed the approval of the resolution against our country's peaceful nuclear program in the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency and wrote: This is the fourth time that Western countries, with the lobbying of the Zionist regime, have submitted a resolution against Iran.

Three European countries, along with the United States, who were accused of violating the agreement, accuse Iran of not fulfilling its obligations. The game of England, France, Germany and America in the International Atomic Energy Agency is a repeated one. They have discredited the technical nature of the Agency and used it as a basis for their interests. This time, as in some cases in the past, false claims of the Zionist regime against Iran have been cited in the draft resolution of the European troika. It seems that now they intend to put pressure on Iran through the approval of the resolution of the Board of Governors to take revenge for the defeat in the Gaza war and the resulting isolation and hatred in the public opinion of the world. Perhaps, in this way, they would force Iran to change its behavior in support of the Palestinian nation and resistance groups.

Donya-e-Eqtesad: The three islands belong to Iran

In a note, Donya-e-Eqtesad dealt with the recent position of China regarding the three islands of Iran and said: One of the important developments in China's relations with the Middle East is the support that this country gives to the UAE's position regarding the three islands. The noticeable point in this matter is that the UAE has found a more prominent position among the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf and has become a commercial hub. So, now the UAE can be considered the most important partner of China in the region in many ways. In general, it should be said that having bargaining tools can provide the necessary conditions to influence the policies of other countries. The Arab countries, including the UAE, which vainly claims the three islands and tries to internationalize this issue, have more diplomatic space. Although this will not mean the success of this country, if the issue is looked at from the point of view of preserving dignity, it reminds us of the need to adopt an active approach, especially in adopting a balanced foreign policy. Therefore, other countries, including China, will not think that the Islamic Republic of Iran does not have the tools to deal with it.

Iran: An unprecedented action with clear messages

The Iran newspaper pointed out the trilateral action of Iran, China and Russia against the Western resolution and wrote: By publishing a joint statement at the meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors, Beijing, Moscow and Tehran united against the trilateral alliance of the European troika and condemned all the obstructions of the Western front from re-imposing the nuclear sanctions to the implementation of the sanctions beyond JCPOA. This statement shows that any possible resolution that the Westerners put forward against Iran in the Security Council will face the strong opposition of China and Russia. The joint position of Iran, China and Russia in the form of a joint statement has taken place for the first time in the meeting of the Board of Governors, but previously Tehran's peaceful approach of understanding with Rafael Grossi to resume a new level of cooperation had a special importance for reflecting in the meeting of the Board of Governors. The trilateral alliance showed that Iran is no longer a passive actor that falls victim to the political game of great powers in fulfilling their ambitious goals.

Jam-e-Jam: A joint project between America and Israel 

The anti-Iranian actions of the Westerners against our country's nuclear activity and their one-sided report were not limited to the recent meeting and are a precedent. The issue of provoking it was first raised by the Prime Minister of the Zionist regime and followed up by the Western negotiators in the later stages and gradually brought to the media, so that they put the necessary bases for using the media to press the Iranian delegation. This case was a part of the joint project of the Zionist regime and the Trump administration, under which maximum pressure was formed against the Islamic Republic of Iran and in the next step it was taken to the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a movement whose traces could be seen in the issuance of other anti-Iranian resolutions at the Agency. By adopting dual positions, the Western parties claim that the remaining safeguards issues are not related to the JCPOA, but their operational actions indicate that the nature of this case is fundamentally political, especially since the Western parties show no will to preserve the JCPOA and refer to it only in necessary cases such as elections.