Kayhan dedicated its editorial to Iran's strategic space success and wrote: The successful launch of Iranian satellites is a strategic success, and for this reason, the enemies of the Islamic Republic and the Islamic world, and the European troika in particular, evaluated this success as a threat to themselves and condemned Iran's industrial action! This condemnation completely exposes Iran's resistance to the anti-Iranian plans and claims of the West.

Some claimed that the West opposes Iran's nuclear power because it can be used for military purposes and has no problem with "industrial Iran" and its progress. This reaction proved that the West basically has a problem with the scientific progress of Iran and the Islamic world, and it also proves that the communication satellites of the West have a function other than this and are in the service of several mainly Western governments to control the world. The problem of the West with Iran is the breaking of the model of world control.

Iran: Do not intensify the tension in West Asia

In an analysis, the Iran newspaper discussed the drone attack on the headquarters of the American forces in Jordan and said: This attack led to many reactions. These reactions have been both inside America and outside the borders of this country. The latest international reaction to this event was adopted by China which, emphasizing the lack of connection between this attack and Iran, demanded prevention of any action that would lead to the spread of tension in West Asia. Finally, it seems that among the American media and think tanks, there is a movement that warns the American government against a direct military confrontation with Iran. Theorizing and analyzing these media reveal a reality; a reality called lobbies and behind-the-scenes currents in America, each of them tries to direct the public opinion and the government of this country based on their interests, or based on the degree of opposition to Iran. In any case, the problem is that a direct attack on Iranian targets is against the interests of the United States, and some believe that if Iran retaliates, the consequences of the expansion of conflicts cannot be calculated.

Sobh-e-No: America is the main culprit of tension in the region

Sobh-e-No dedicated its editorial to the presence of the U.S. in the region to create the increase of tension and said: Since October 7, the intensity of conflict and tension in the region has increased and some incidents are out of control. The last example of these tensions was the attack on the American base. America itself knows that its response to this attack should not be in such a way that its consequences will once again focus on its interests because as a result of any strategic mistake by the U.S. or an attack on Iran, the situation after the attack becomes much more critical. America and its allies, in numerous messages, invite Iran to de-escalate and inhibit, but they provoke the war. If the U.S. had joined the majority of countries in the world that approved the Gaza ceasefire resolution in the United Nations and had not vetoed it, the region would not have seen this level of tension today. Therefore, the first defendant of any war in the region is America. America must try to end the war in Gaza, otherwise, any actor who supports the Israeli regime will suffer losses.

Etemad: The need for an urgent dialogue between Iran and America

In a note, Etemad addressed the critical situation in the West Asia region and wrote: In general, and especially in these conditions where the whispers of war have risen, and there is a possibility of the intervention of uncontrollable elements, and considering the unexpected costs of any direct conflict the best action is still dialogue and diplomacy between Iran and America. This is both for the benefit of the two countries, for the benefit of the regional balance, and for the benefit of humanity and the oppressed people of Gaza. The dialogue is an opportunity for the two countries to directly reach a relative understanding about regional tensions and increase the pressure on Israel to reach a ceasefire. In case of any conflict between Iran and America, the ceasefire will also be delayed, and in fact, the context and subject of the war will be transferred to another level and geography. This possibility will not have any meaning except to satisfy the demand of Israel, which is looking for a deviation of the global concentration from the failure and genocide of Gaza, and also to ensure the interests of Iran's regional competitors and America's global competitors such as Russia, China, etc. Direct and immediate dialogue to control the tension level is a win-win approach.