TEHRAN- The Israeli brutality has so far resulted in the martyrdom of over 8,500 Palestinians, including some 3,500 innocent children whose bodies have been mutilated by the barbaric raids of the Tel Aviv army.

Some Western human rights claimants and media outlets have kept portraying the oppressors as the oppressed and vice versa, presenting this biased view that the death of 1,500 usurpers is more painful than the martyrdom of 8,500 innocent Palestinians.    

If Hamas defends its homeland and fights against the aggressor, it is called a “terrorist and leverage for Iran,” in the eyes of the Westerners. 

If Palestine had not been usurped and occupied, if the innocent had not been displaced from their homeland, there would not have been an aggressor and occupying tyrant called Israel. 

Is Iran the cause for the martyrdom of Gazans’ martyrdom? They are defending their homeland and sacrificing their lives.

The USS Gerald Ford aircraft carrier is on the way to the Eastern Mediterranean in a show of support for Israel that was established through bullying and massacre 75 years ago, yet is it fair to call Iran the cause of the spread of terror in West Asia?

Believe it or not, the Telegraph titled its October 29 analysis "How the West allowed Iran to unleash horror across the Middle East".

You are probably surprised by the title chosen by Daniel Johnson, the writer of the analysis. He made every effort to play the blame game. 

From his point of view, if the Palestinian people are defending their land against the aggressors and an occupier dies, Palestinians are branded as “terrorists” and the occupier is depicted as “innocent”. If Iran helps nations who are culturally and religiously close to its people, its action is termed as a spread of terror. 

But if the U.S. deploys its forces and weapons to West Asia, builds dozens of military bases in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan, starts a war, kills people, and occupies other people’s lands, the action is not the spread of terror?  

Who does the Telegraph really write such analyses for? For the British people who staged rallies in support of Palestine? For the Scots where stadiums are filled with Palestinian flags? For the Irish citizens on the streets, or their representative who shouts the oppression of Gaza in the European Parliament?!
Why do Western officials and media outlets refuse to accept that they are just a tyrannical minority in the world? Why have they closed their eyes to this reality that the slogans of the Islamic Republic of Iran are being resonated in Palestine?  

These are important questions that the West must answer.

Referring to the slogan "Palestine will be free from the river to the sea", which was chanted in the marches of the people of London, the author says: "This slogan means the elimination of Israel".

If people in London, New York, Paris, Rome, and Berlin have understood that Palestine starts from the river and extends to the sea, this means that there was no Israel. So, the free nations of the world have finally realized the truthfulness of Palestine after 44 years that the Islamic Republic has been talking about it, and now they can distinguish right from wrong! 

It is always said that the West is not aware of the Iranian people’s views and makes miscalculations about them. However, the irony is that the Western rulers do not even comprehend their own nations.  

Westerners are fine till they are accompanied by the public, but in case of any objection, they suppress the opposition voices. They have decorated their world with false democracy. 

The writer claims that Iranians only understand the language of “force”. This claim is just a dream.