LONDON (APP) -- Indian commentators have spoken of the poorly equipped Mumbai Police and a highly corrupt procurement system that has blighted police training and its subsequent mediocre response to the last week’s deadly attacks by armed gunmen.

A report in The Times said Indian police who bore the brunt of last week’s attacks on Mumbai had defective bulletproof vests, First World War-era firearms and insufficient weapons training.
“Many wore plastic helmets and body protectors designed for sticks and stones, rather than bullets, as they fought highly trained militants armed with AK47 rifles, pistols, grenades and explosives,” the paper wrote.
The daily said the contrast between them was vividly illustrated by CCTV footage of two militants attacking Chhatrapati Shivaji terminus, Mumbai’s main railway station, last Wednesday.
It shows the gunmen spraying automatic fire while two constables cower behind pillars, one armed with a .303 rifle similar to the Lee-Enfield weapons used by British troops in the First World War.
Similar scenes were played out at other targets in the first seven hours of the attacks, in which 16 policemen died, including three of India’s top officers.
“That’s 16 too many, Maxwell Pereira, a former joint commissioner of Delhi police, told the paper. These casualties could have been prevented if they’d been properly equipped. The abysmal state of police equipment helps to explain how ten gunmen managed to paralyze a metropolis of 18 million people for more than 60 hours.
It also illustrates how ill-prepared India’s 2.2 million-strong police force is to tackle another such attack.
“We’d react exactly the same way tomorrow,” Ajay Sahni, of the Institute for Conflict Management, said.
He described India as one of the least policed places in the world, with 126 officers per 100,000 people, compared with 225-550 per 100,000 in most Western countries.
Maharashtra state, of which Mumbai is the capital, has one of India’s better police forces, but even it is woefully ill-equipped because of a centralized and highly corrupt procurement system.
Y. P. Singh, who retired after 20 years in the Maharashtra police in 2005, told The Times that he knew of two batches of body armor that had failed tests in 2001 and 2004. They couldn’t take rounds from AK47 or AK56,”he said. The bullets pierced the jackets.
He now believes that Maharashtra police purchased the defective vests and issued them to officers last week.
According to Anurag Gupta, the company director, which supplies vests to the Government, India has only 100,000 bullet proof vests for police and paramilitary forces.
“The helmets used last week were World War Two-era, not designed for combat, he said.
Most of the police involved were carrying .303s or self-loading rifles like those adopted by the British Army in the 1950s.
Some officers told the paper that they were not given enough weapons training because of a shortage of ammunition and shooting ranges. In theory, all officers shoot 50 rounds a year in training. In practice, senior officers get their full quota with small arms.
The rest is all bunkum, Mr. Pereira said. It’s target practice with a .303 rifle. I wouldn’t call it suitable knowledge of weapons and their uses in urban policing.
All those interviewed by the newspaper said that the issue was not money:
the Government allocated 154 million pounds for modernizing the police in 2007-08 alone. The problem, they said, lay with the Indian Home Ministry’s procurement system, which is dominated by corrupt bureaucrats and politicians rather than technical experts.
“It’s a cartel, Mr. Singh said. The Government is spending millions, but the police isn’t getting the equipment it needs.