TEHRAN - In a highly anticipated decision, Iran Football Federation’s Disciplinary Committee has issued a ruling in the long-running dispute between Persepolis FC and their former goalkeeper, Alireza Beiranvand. The ruling, which has been met with widespread criticism, pertains to Beiranvand's unilateral termination of his contract with Persepolis and subsequent move to Tractor.

Persepolis had filed a complaint against Beiranvand in June 2024, alleging a breach of contract. The committee's verdict has imposed a four-month suspension on Beiranvand from all football-related activities, both domestically and internationally. However, the suspension has been suspended for one year, meaning it will only be activated if Beiranvand commits a similar offense within the next 12 months!

The decision has raised eyebrows among legal experts and football fans alike. Critics argue that a suspended sentence is typically reserved for disciplinary offenses committed during a match, rather than for a contractual dispute. The federation's justification for the suspended sentence is that Beiranvand has a clean disciplinary record.

Persepolis has expressed deep dissatisfaction with the ruling, arguing that they have suffered significant financial losses as a result of Beiranvand's departure and that the suspended sentence is insufficient. The club has hinted at appealing the decision to FIFA and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

The Federation's decision to impose a suspended sentence has been seen as an attempt to appease both parties involved. However, the ruling is unlikely to satisfy Persepolis, who feel that they have been unfairly treated. The case has highlighted the challenges faced by Iranian football in enforcing contracts and protecting the interests of clubs.

The lengthy duration of the case, which spanned over three months, has also drawn criticism. Many have questioned the efficiency of the disciplinary committee and the transparency of the decision-making process.