TEHRAN - Kayhan devoted its editorial to the withdrawal of projects such as the IMEC commercial corridor for an indefinite period and said: The "India-Middle East-Europe" economic corridor and more precisely the "India-Israel-Europe" corridor was originally an "American-Israeli" idea.

The main purpose of this corridor is to connect India to Israel and then to Europe through the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan. One of the reasons for creating this corridor was competition with Chabahar port, in other words, competition with the north-south corridor centered on Iran. Arun K. Singh, the former ambassador of India to America and Israel, recently said in a statement that influence in West Asia without considering the role of Iran is a strategic mistake. Now, for many reasons, America and the Zionist regime are the two biggest losers in the West Asia region. There is nothing left of the American hegemony, and Israel is also in trouble. Currently, the war of wills between Iran and America extends from the Strait of Hormuz to the Panama Canal. We are now facing a new world order and the new Middle East is also defined in this puzzle.

Arman-e-Melli: Iran is a field of diplomacy

In a note about Israel's failure to terrorize Iran, Arman-e-Melli wrote: There is no end to Tel Aviv's bluffs in attacking Iran. It was the last hours of Monday night when official and unofficial news agencies announced the convening of the Zionist War Cabinet meeting. The meeting was about the response to Tehran's attack on Tel Aviv. An hour later, however, the news came that Tehran had announced to Israel and America through several sources, including Egypt, that if Tel Aviv plans to attack Iran, Tehran will immediately respond with stronger intensity than the initial attack on Israel and it will be devastating. The opposition media also heavily maneuvered the news published by Israel about the possibility of attacking Iran and even suggested military locations for the attack. The fact is that they could not create a psychological war among the Iranian people, and the Iranian people neither left the streets nor were afraid of these psychological wars. The traffic in the streets of Tehran and the citizens' indifference to Israel's threats were even witnesses to this issue.

Sobh-e-No: The effects of repetitive stupidity

Sobh-e-No devoted its editorial to the consequences that Israel would expect if it responded to the True Promise of missile operation. It wrote: Although in the past days, some Israeli officials or media close to them have claimed that they would respond to Iran's attack and the media atmosphere created at the end of Monday also indicated the certainty of the Israeli regime's reaction to Iran's attack but after a few hours, the published news and positions indicated that the Zionist regime has given up on this reaction. Western countries have realized that any strategic mistake towards Iran will result in a new Middle East. Therefore, behind the scenes, they are trying to prevent the adventurism of the Israeli regime, and so far, these consultations have worked. If the Israeli regime wants to give a strong response to Iran's attack, then it must wait for an all-out attack by Iran and its allies. In that case we will probably witness a classic war in southern Lebanon between Hezbollah and the Israeli regime and the rain of missiles and drones from Iran, Iraq and Yemen will be headed towards the occupied territories, and from these events, a new Middle East will be born, which will be 180 degrees different from the great Middle East that America was looking for.

Javan: It was just us!

In its editorial, Javan pointed out the authority and independence of Iran in its direct attack on Israel. The paper said: In Iran's attack on the occupied Palestinian territories on Saturday night, the polarization of analysts was not based only on their relationship with the Islamic Republic. From the opposition to Western experts, they took the issue beyond their political tendencies, and this phenomenon is unique in its kind. Analyzing Iran's attack within the scope of a military operation is a reduction and diversion of the issue. This attack changed the route of contemporary history. The basic value of this work is that in today's world, Iran makes independent decisions in front of the arrogant and hegemonic world and does not ask permission from anyone, and the second value is that it has done so with its own weapons. This is a valuable time to have a clear picture of 220-year-old Iran, where we have come from, and how we have ended those historical humiliation, shameful contracts, partition, occupation, and coup.