TEHRAN PAPERS

Kayhan: The answer to Israel should be like this

April 5, 2024 - 22:8

TEHRAN - Kayhan wrote in its editorial: The regimes that are being destroyed, do anything to survive.

The social gaps in Israel have deepened in an unprecedented way and the Zionists today do not want Netanyahu and his cabinet. Just yesterday, the Zionists attacked the Knesset building and occupied it for several hours. You should add international pressure, especially public opinion, on this regime. Netanyahu feels very well that these pressures are unprecedented. Today, no country in the world can defend this regime and its behavior. Today, the Zionist regime is in its most isolated and hated state, and this is "unbearable" for Netanyahu and other leaders of this regime. The Zionists know very well that their brutal attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus will be answered. They have declared this and it can be understood from the behaviors they show. We think that Iran's answer should be such that it is not included in the enemy's calculations. In this case, it will definitely have the necessary deterrence. Time is also "important".

Iran: Strange and illogical

In a note, the Iran newspaper addressed the United Nations Security Council meeting regarding the Zionist regime's attack on Iran's diplomatic building and said: The reaction and position of the representatives of Washington, London, and Paris in the Security Council meeting and the statements of American officials regarding the occurrence of this terrorist attack were strange and illogical because they claimed ignorance and created tension in the Security Council meeting. Robert Wood, the U.S. Deputy Ambassador to the United Nations, and John Kirby, the National Security Communications Advisor of the White House, claimed that they had no role in the attack on Damascus. This was while the representatives of England and France were silent and demanded self-restraint from the parties. These positions once again displayed the common features of Western countries' politics. They justified the brutal actions of Tel Aviv and instead of condemning this terrorist attack, they put the resistance in the place of the accused, and in a far-fetched interpretation, they claimed that the current tensions reflect Iran's support for the resistance movements.

Siasat-e-Rooz: Supporting Palestine is a global issue

Siasat-e-Rooz dedicated its editorial to the diverting of the people's attitude towards the crimes of Israel by the Western media and wrote: A realistic view of the developments in Palestine expresses the truth that has been marginalized in the Western media companies and attempts are made to keep the people ignorant of it. The issue of Palestine is not the issue of a few million Palestinians, the Arab world, or even the Muslims, but the issue of all humanity, which is related to the fate of every human being. The important point is that attributing the Palestinian issue to the Islamic world is also a big lie that the West seeks to instill in humanity, while this regime is a threat against all divine religions, including Christianity and even Jews. At the same time, the Zionist and Persian-language media and opposition circles are trying to attribute the hostility to this regime only to Iran. Based on this, it can be said that confronting the Zionist regime and supporting Palestine is not only an Islamic matter but a global task and mission.

Etamed: Creating an opportunity for a terrorist attack by Israel on Iran

In a commentary, Etemad dealt with creating an opportunity from Israel's terrorist attack on Iran and said: Israel's attack on our country's consulate in Syria has various dimensions. Some groups consider this action to be a change in Israel's tactics on the battlefield. In order to get rid of severe internal deadlocks, it tries to move the scope of the conflict outside its borders. It is possible to think that the Prime Minister of Israel is at a deadlock in the Gaza war, and the result is his defeat. If he can turn the war into a war of attrition, he may find an outlet. Now the Islamic Republic of Iran has the upper hand in this field. On the one hand, it can negotiate with the Russians to somehow cover the security of the Syrian skies. The atmosphere at the level of the UN Security Council is also in the interest of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran can also form a kind of alliance with the Arab world. In addition, Tehran has the ability to design favorable cooperation with a country like Switzerland, which had an anti-Israel position in the Security Council.