-

 
logo
                                        Volume. 11710

Pakistan rout cut-off costs billions of dollars: Pentagon
PDF Print E-mail
Font Size Larger Font Smaller Font
Fuel tankers, which were used to carry fuel for U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, are parked at a compound in Karachi, May 23, 2012.
Fuel tankers, which were used to carry fuel for U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, are parked at a compound in Karachi, May 23, 2012.
The Pentagon has asked Congress to shift billions of dollars in the defense budget to pay for added fuel costs to ferry supplies to Afghanistan after Pakistan closed its border to NATO convoys, U.S. officials said Monday.
 
In an 82-page letter to congressional defense committees, the Pentagon requested “reprogramming” $8.2 billion in funds previously approved to finance more urgent priorities, officials said, AFP reported.
 
There were “some unanticipated costs that we just didn’t foresee,” spokesman Captain John Kirby told reporters.
 
It remained unclear what programs in the defense budget would receive less funding as a result.
 
There were "some unanticipated costs that we just didn't foresee," Pentagon spokesman Captain John Kirby told reporters at a press conference.
 
He added that a large portion of the requested fund was due to the expenditures "associated with the extended closure of the ground lines of communication" in Pakistan.
 
Pakistan had been the main supply route for U.S.-led forces occupying Afghanistan from October 2001 to November 2011.
 
Islamabad closed the border crossings used to transfer U.S.-led NATO supplies to Afghanistan in November 2011, after 24 Pakistani soldiers were killed in U.S.-led airstrikes on two checkpoints on the Afghan border. 
 
Last month, NATO reached agreements with Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan to allow the Western military alliance to transport vehicles and other military hardware from Afghanistan.
 
NATO previously made an agreement with Russia on an exit route, permitting the alliance to send tens of thousands of vehicles and supplies from Afghanistan to Europe later this year.
 
Yet the Pentagon has argued that the additional funds are necessary. “Without this funding the Army runs the risk of an interruption in the flow of supplies, subsistence and mail to deployed war fighters,” read the request sent to the Congress.

rssfeed socializeit
Socialize this
Subscribe to our RSS feed to stay in touch and receive all of TT updates right in your feed reader
Twitter Facebook Myspace Stumbleupon Digg Technorati aol blogger google reddit